Warning: file_get_contents(map.txt) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/energy/public_html/nobiomassburning.org/wp-includes/feed-rss3.php on line 100

Warning: in_array() [function.in-array]: Wrong datatype for second argument in /home/energy/public_html/nobiomassburning.org/wp-includes/feed-rss3.php on line 115
Bill Would Sell Off Public Lands to Industry [The Biomass Monitor] | No Biomass Burning

- by Julia Waite

March 16, 2012:  Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) introduced a bill into the U.S. House of Representatives to initiate a large-scale sell off of federally owned lands in the western United States. Colorado, Wyoming and Montana are among the ten states implicated under H.R. 1126, the “Disposal of Excess Federal Lands Act of 2011,” which calls upon the Secretary of the Interior to direct the sale of 3.3 million acres of land identified as suitable for “disposal” or “other purposes,” including Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands, one-quarter of which are forested.

Logging on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands in Low Pass, Oregon

In a revenue-raising effort by the government, tracts will be sold to private investors on the competitive market. This relinquishment of federally owned land presents itself as a valuable opportunity for the timber and biomass industries. Lumber, furniture, and paper manufacturing industries all seek to benefit, but what is generating concern among some observers, as the bill enters the House Natural Resources Subcommittee, is that the sale presents a huge opportunity for the biomass industry.

A major limiting factor for biofuels in becoming an economically viable producer of electricity has been the availability of wood. “Obtaining a consistent supply of woody biomass from federal lands is one of the primary impediments to developing a biomass utilization sector,” according to biomass proponent Sustainable Northwest. The speculation that House and Senate versions of a policy that would amend the Waxman-Markey energy bill to allow biomass from federal lands to qualify as “renewable” feedstock for biofuels production similarly threatens to increase logging for biomass.

Biomass opponents challenge the rhetoric of benevolence by government that private stewardship is needed to manage the fire risks that “threaten” forests. In 2003, the so-called Healthy Forest Restoration Act (HFRA) was passed into law with a priority purpose to “reduce wildfire risks to communities.” Under the guise of fire protection, the government has essentially been priming its federally owned lands for exploitation by the biomass industry. The potential for industry profit is double because, in addition to purchasing the land rights to cut and burn biomass in the future, the trees felled during the “thinning” process can also be sold for fuel chipping.

Home ignitability, rather than forests fuels, is the principal cause of home losses during wild land/urban interface fires. Recent science demonstrates that large wildfires are more often a product of drought and low humidity, than fuel levels. If conditions are ripe, especially with high winds, thinning doesn’t necessarily stop big wildfires, and it might actually make things worse. Thinning a forest opens it up to sunlight, which dries the forest and also exposes it to winds, which can hasten the spread of flames during wildfires

So what is the effect of these regulations that would sell off federal lands? At best, it adds yet another layer of human interference with the natural cycle of decomposition and regeneration. At worst, it can be perceived as a concerted effort by government to further prime public lands for sale to the timber and biomass industries.


2 Responses to Bill Would Sell Off Public Lands to Industry [The Biomass Monitor]

  1. William Blackley, MD says:

    If our government wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions . . . just mandate that none of the timber could be burned in incinerators, power plants, etc.

  2. David Beebe says:

    Thanks for this ‘head’s-up’ on privatization of public lands in the name of ‘renewable energy’. Still, this is a symptom of a larger problem that must be addressed.

    In reference to, ‘Biomass opponents challenge the rhetoric of benevolence by government that private stewardship is needed…’, I urge one and all to understand these code words for what they REALLY mean.

    Please become familiar with the dominant macroeconomic policy now common to Dems and Repubs alike: neoliberalism. Neoliberal goals are to privatize, deregulate (or reregulate), devolve decision making and public process, and outsource governmental functions to corporations.

    Notice too, that this legislation advancing privatization of public lands in the name of biomass for ‘renewable energy’, achieves every one of these goals handily(not to mention accelerates climate change and ocean acidification).

    Neoliberalism is the dominant paradigm of the IMF and World Bank and the US government. Neoliberalism is behind the ruination of Chile, Iceland, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Columbia, etc. etc. and is now coming home to roost in Amerika under the rubric of ‘austerity’.

    It’s time to address the root cause of the problems we are now facing — challenge each and every one of our representatives and demand they abandon their allegiances to the neoliberal model.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>